Question
Aggiornato il
17 mar 2018
- Inglese (Regno Unito)
- Russo Quasi esperto
-
Russo
-
Spagnolo (Spagna)
Domande Russo
Hi
This is a question about movie /history of the battle of Sebastopol (2015 movie).
I'm a big fan of ww2 history, and once thing I was really dismayed with was the end of the movie which seemed to be narrated from an a American perspective and painted the soviet leadership as being we because they didn't do any mass evacuation of people.
However this ignores the reality of the situation, whereby the black Sea fleet lost 3/4 of all ships (including merchant ships) in continuous resupply and evacuation operations. People were evacuated until the last moment, and even after the peninsula was taken the navy sent many patrol boats (despite that being very risky) hoping to rescue anyone swimming away or in makeshift rafts, and in fact many more people were picked up at sea.
In addition to this, in real life she was taken out of active duty after being injured by mortar fire and was never made to fight despite being injured, in fact she was evacuated in 1942, along with many other people.
Given the movie was made jointly by companies and producers in Russia and Ukraine, why is there such a negative attitude towards soviet leaders and such a negative and ahistorical ending?
Hi
This is a question about movie /history of the battle of Sebastopol (2015 movie).
I'm a big fan of ww2 history, and once thing I was really dismayed with was the end of the movie which seemed to be narrated from an a American perspective and painted the soviet leadership as being we because they didn't do any mass evacuation of people.
However this ignores the reality of the situation, whereby the black Sea fleet lost 3/4 of all ships (including merchant ships) in continuous resupply and evacuation operations. People were evacuated until the last moment, and even after the peninsula was taken the navy sent many patrol boats (despite that being very risky) hoping to rescue anyone swimming away or in makeshift rafts, and in fact many more people were picked up at sea.
In addition to this, in real life she was taken out of active duty after being injured by mortar fire and was never made to fight despite being injured, in fact she was evacuated in 1942, along with many other people.
Given the movie was made jointly by companies and producers in Russia and Ukraine, why is there such a negative attitude towards soviet leaders and such a negative and ahistorical ending?
This is a question about movie /history of the battle of Sebastopol (2015 movie).
I'm a big fan of ww2 history, and once thing I was really dismayed with was the end of the movie which seemed to be narrated from an a American perspective and painted the soviet leadership as being we because they didn't do any mass evacuation of people.
However this ignores the reality of the situation, whereby the black Sea fleet lost 3/4 of all ships (including merchant ships) in continuous resupply and evacuation operations. People were evacuated until the last moment, and even after the peninsula was taken the navy sent many patrol boats (despite that being very risky) hoping to rescue anyone swimming away or in makeshift rafts, and in fact many more people were picked up at sea.
In addition to this, in real life she was taken out of active duty after being injured by mortar fire and was never made to fight despite being injured, in fact she was evacuated in 1942, along with many other people.
Given the movie was made jointly by companies and producers in Russia and Ukraine, why is there such a negative attitude towards soviet leaders and such a negative and ahistorical ending?
Risposte
Leggi ulteriori commenti
- Russo
all that is done with the participation of Ukraine can not be considered adequate. this applies to any industry.
you also need to understand that people who make films are representatives of the ideas of those who give them money. to expect from them a correct display of reality does not make sense.
Questa risposta ti è stata d'aiuto?
[Novità] Ehi tu! Dico a te che stai imparando una lingua!
Sai come migliorare le tue abilità linguistiche❓ Basta far correggere ciò che scrivi da un madrelingua!
Con HiNative, puoi ricevere correzioni su ciò che scrivi da utenti madrelingua gratis ✍️✨.
Con HiNative, puoi ricevere correzioni su ciò che scrivi da utenti madrelingua gratis ✍️✨.
Registrazione
domande simili
Domande suggerite
- What meaning does же have in this sentence: "Ярохвост же окинул взглядом ряды своих воинов."
- что означает «)» в конце предложения? (я думаю что это сленг или что-то) what does “(“ at the ...
- Не могу понять смысл этой фразы: "наименование организации, осуществляющей учет, расчет и начисл...
- Скажите, пожалуйста, почему Вы предпочитаете выражение «Автобусы/трамваи/поезда ходят» выражению ...
- Добрый вечер, русские друзья! Мне непонятно, почему правильными ответами на пункты 1, 2, 3, 15, 1...
Newest Questions (HOT)
- SPICCARE IL VOLO si usa SOLO per i figli quando vogliono avere una vita indipendente?
- Buongiorno, potreste leggere e correggere il mio testo, per favore? Adesso in Giappone tanta sab...
- Which one is correct? 1- il posto dove in contro gli ospiti. 2- il posto dove incontrò gli ospiti.
- È corretto? Mi sveglio presto, ma la mia sorella si sveglia molto tardi. È troppo pigra! Adesso...
- Ora imparo il voce passiva di italiano. Ma non capisco perché questo frase è corretto. Anche la ...
Domande Recenti
- Ciao!🖐 When I saw the Neapolitan lyrics of "Funiculi Funicula" in class and the Italian translat...
- Il termine "mezzosangue" si associa con gli animali? Non posso dire che una persona della etnia m...
- Do they always use articles before a noun in Italian? I ragazzi mangiano "la" zuppa o I ragazzi ...
- ""sentire la notizia DA radio/TV" è corretta?
- in risposta a MI DISPIACE si può dire ANCHE A ME ???
Domanda precedente/successiva
Grazie! Puoi essere certo che il tuo feedback non verrà mostrato agli altri utenti.
Grazie mille! Il tuo feedback è molto apprezzato.